April 1, 2011

My Stilettos Don’t Invite Rape, My Society Does

Culture, Feature 1 Comment

Sexual Assault Awareness Month

April is Sexual Assault Awareness Month. According to the National Violence Against Women Survey, 1 in 6 women and 1 in 33 men in the United States has experienced rape, or a rape attempt. Sexual violence doesn’t have a single apparent cause; the probability lies between the risk factor that increases the potential of sexual violence and the protective factor, which reduces its likelihood. Unfortunately, when sexual violence occurs, the immediate response from the public is to analyze the victim’s actions.

Even focusing too much on the person committing the crime fails to address the problem of sexual violence on a societal level. Norms can and do contribute to the problem of sexual violence. One of the most egregious is the tolerance of aggression and attribution of blame to the victim.

That the past month has exposed gross instances of victim blame is sadly not surprising, but what is surprising is the origin of the blame. In February, a judge in the Canadian province of Manitoba decided against jailing a convicted rapist because he felt the victim had indicated “sex was in the air” with her wardrobe and her flirting the night the attack happened.

Prosecution was looking for at least three years behind bars, but Kenneth Rhodes instead was handed a two-year conditional sentence with a curfew that allows him to remain free. Justice Robert Dewar suggested Rhodes was just a “clumsy Don Juan” who misunderstood what the victim wanted when he forced her to have sex with him along a dark highway. The girl had met Rhodes in “inviting circumstances,” Dewar noted, adding that she was wearing a tube top with no bra, high heels and a lot of makeup.

“This is a case of misunderstood signals and inconsiderate behavior,” said the judge.

This judge is a man who upholds laws put in place to protect citizens. He is referring to the rape of a woman as “inconsiderate behavior.” Consent, he is implying, depends on the context. By this is he not basically saying that anyone who goes out on a date is consenting to sex with the other party? They accepted the date, right? They showed up all dolled up, in a little black dress and stilettos. They flirted. They smiled and kissed. Obviously the person they’re with is entitled to have sex with them at will.

Wrong. Date rape exists. As does spousal rape, for that matter, because even marriage does not imply consent. When did this become unclear?

Even more recently, the New York Times, a celebrated national publication reported on the vicious gang assault of an 11-year-old girl with a slant that can only be described as “as victim-blaming as humanly possible.”

The girl was invited by a boy she knew into a trailer, where she threatened with violence and raped by some 18 boys and men (their ages ranged from middle-schoolers to a 27-year-old). The assault was filmed on phones and later spread, which is how it came to light.

Instead of reporting the events, the author of the feature, James C. McKinley Jr. fills the piece with factors that must have resulted in this gruesome act: “Residents in the neighborhood where the abandoned trailer stands — known as the Quarters — said the victim had been visiting various friends there for months. They said she dressed older than her age, wearing makeup and fashions more appropriate to a woman in her 20s. She would hang out with teenage boys at a playground, some said.”

Again, consent is implied by what she wears and where she goes. Never mind that a minor is incapable of consenting to any sexual act. Consent is there. She dressed like a 20-something. Thus, she asked for it.

As if that were not sufficiently infuriating, the Times includes a selection of other quotes that continue in this pattern. A notable example: “These boys have to live with this the rest of their lives.” These boys will?! Where is the victim here?

McKinley succeeded in something: exposing how far that community needs to go in terms of understanding sexual assault. Of course, by running McKinley’s piece, the New York Times has exposed themselves in equal measure. To end sexual violence, we as a community need to stop being permissive, quit looking for reasons that led perpetrators to these acts, begin to set an example and begin to question what societal norms are enforcing violent sexual behavior. The media plays a great role in public perception in everything including the allocation of blame. When the media fails to police its commentary, they do the whole of society as gross a disservice as that which a judge commits when he lets a rapist go free with what amounts to a slap on the wrist and the worthless demand that he send his victim an apology letter.

The journalism doesn’t have to be as reckless as that in the New York Times. Following the gang sexual assault of reporter Lara Logan in Cairo, Ward Harkay, a senior editor at the Village Voice, in an article meant to draw attention to accuracy in reporting, inadvertently created a scale of horror, claiming sexual assault is “almost as bad, but still not as bad as rape.”

There is a reason why surveys discussing sexual assault talk about the statistics of rape and attempted rape. The psychological violence and resulting damage of assault does not require an actual rape. Creating a scale of evils is not helpful in discussing the problem of assault.

But this is not a story about a bad judge, a reckless journalist and an insensitive editor. These three cases reflect the society in which we live, one that inadvertently enforces these behaviors by blaming victims when violations occur, effectively absolving perpetrators.

What we want you to do is for Sexual Assault Awareness Month is to start listening. Listen to how people describe situations of sexual assault and sexual harassment. Where is the blame? Question the impulse to blame the victim, in yourself and in others. The only way to shift a norm is to start from within.

Photo in the header by zelnunes. Header also features lyrics from the song “Me and a Gun” by Tori Amos.

AV Flox

Your humble editrix-in-command.

More Posts - Website - Twitter - Facebook

Facebook

Add our page on Google+!

Keep up with everything we're covering right in your stream. Please note this page is limited to users 18+.

Featured

Gamers Won’t Be Seduced, Will Stare At Random Cleav Instead

That Steam allows the objectification and sexualization of female characters in a variety of its games but refuses to accept a game about actually engaging with women in a more interactive fashion is astonishingly backward.

FetLife Is Not Safe for Users

That the site doesn’t take measures to protect user content and has shown incompetence or negligence in regard to user privacy, all the while prohibiting victims from warning others about predatory behavior creates an environment where it is nearly impossible for members of the community to take care of themselves and one another. By enabling FetLife to continue espousing a code of silence, allowing the spinning self-created security issues as “attacks,” and not pointing out how disingenuous FetLife statements about safety are, we are allowing our community to become a breeding ground for exploitation.

Why You Should Vote No On Prop 35

Should people who benefit (parents, siblings, children, roommates!) from the earnings of “commercial sex acts” (any sexual conduct connected to the giving or receiving of something of value) be charged with human trafficking? Should someone who creates obscene material that is deemed “deviant” be charged as with human trafficking? Should someone who profits from obscene materials be charged with human trafficking? Should people transporting obscene materials be charged with human trafficking? Should a person who engages in sex with someone claiming to be above the age of consent or furnishing a fake ID to this effect be charged with human trafficking? What if I told you the sentences for that kind of conviction were eight, 14 or 20 years in prison, a fine not to exceed $500,000, and life as a registered sex offender?

Pretty and Calls Herself a Geek? Attention Whore!

If you are a woman, you might be given a chance to prove yourself in this community. Since there is no standard definition of what a “geek” is and it will vary from one judge to the next anyway, chances of failing are high (cake and grief counseling will be available after the conclusion of the test!). If you somehow manage to succeed, you’ll be tested again and again by anyone who encounters you until you manage to establish yourself like, say, Felicia Day. But even then, you’ll be questioned. As a woman, your whole existence within the geek community will be nothing but a series of tests — if you’re lucky. If you aren’t lucky, you’ll be harassed and threatened and those within the culture will tacitly agree that you deserve it.

Cuddle Chemical? Moral Molecule? Not So Fast

Zak’s original field, it turns out, is economics, a far cry from the hearts and teddy bears we imagine when we consider his nickname. But after performing experiments on generosity, Zak stumbled on the importance of trust in interactions, which led him, rather inevitably, to research about oxytocin. Oxytocin, you might remember, is a hormone that has been linked previously to bonding — between mothers and children primarily, but also between partners. What Zak has done is take the research a step further, arguing in his recent book, The Moral Molecule, that oxytocin plays a role in determining whether we are good or evil.

How to Avoid Pissing off a Stripper

Let’s talk about the strippers. Whether they like to be half-naked or not, whether they enjoy turning you on or not, there’s one thing they all have in common: they’re working. Whether you think that taking one’s clothes off for money is a great choice of career is really beside the point (is it a possibility for you to make $500 per hour at your job without a law degree? Just asking). These women are providing fantasy, yes, but that is their job. And as a patron of the establishment where they work, you need to treat them like you would anyone else who provides a service to you.

Masthead

Send us news!

Editrix-in-Command:
AV Flox

In-House Theologian:
Robert Fischer

Eros and Desire Scholar:
Dawn Kaczmar

Scientific Consultant:
Jason Goldman

East Coast Liaison:
Jackie Summers

Arch-Nemesis:
Barbie Davenporte

Read about the contributors we've had over time on our staff page.

Follow SAT405 on:
Twitter
Facebook

RSS

Hosted by (mt)

About

Sex and the 405 is what your newspaper would look like if it had a sex section.

Here you’ll find news about the latest research being conducted to figure out what drives desire, passion, and other sex habits; reviews of sex toys, porn and other sexy things; coverage of the latest sex-related news that have our mainstream media's panties up in a bunch; human interest pieces about sex and desire; interviews with people who love sex, or hate sex, or work in sex, or work to enable you to have better sex; opinion pieces that relate to sex and society; and the sex-related side of celebrity gossip. More...